Lawing it up
So I’ve been lawing it up now for about three weeks and so far things are going pretty well apart from my over-exerting myself in trying to navigate the complex matter of ingratiating oneself to ones peers (of which I have so far 122 and counting), and under-exerting myself on the matter of remembering law. Read I can do. Remembering. That’s the problem – so far I’m at about 50%. I can remember that Miller was the guy who set a house on fire with a cigarette when he was asleep and on waking thought he’d solve this oopsy by just going back to sleep in the next room. And then there was poor Pittwood. Guilty of manslaughter as his job was to lower the rail at the level crossing. But so much was on his mind that day that he just didn’t. As to why these little stories are important - the true legal gravity of the cases, and the years in which they happened and where they are reported, all that other important stuff… well I dunno.
That said, some cases are so bizarre that you’re really not going to have any trouble. Like this one in which a man named Quick [1973] , a psychiatric nurse, and a diabetic, under the encouragement of a helpful fellow employee named Paddison, a bottle of whiskey and some rum; attacked a patient in the hospital in which he was working. It seems that a troph of judges in such cases (and in general) is to either naively or obsequiously lay out the matter in a manner that no truly sane person would. Consider the following report:
The defendants were both employed at Farleigh Mental Hospital, Flax Bourton, Somerset. Quick was a charge nurse, Paddison a state enrolled nurse. At the trial it was not disputed that at about 4 p.m. on December 27, 1971, one Green, a paraplegic spastic patient unable to walk, was sitting in Rosemount Ward at the hospital, watching television. Quick was on duty; Paddison had gone off duty at 2 p.m. but was still present in the ward. Half an hour later, Green had sustained two black eyes, a fractured nose, a split lip which required three stitches, and bruising of his arm and shoulders. There was undisputed medical evidence that these injuries could not have been self-inflicted.
This was after the guys admitted their guilt, but naturally before subsequent the legal wrangling began in which Quick suggested that he was an automaton thanks to insulin and whiskey. Maybe that’s what happened to the borg. Maybe Jean luc Picard could’ve solved the whole first contact thing a lot quicker by bringing along a few sugar cubes? That said, I haven’t actually seen the film, so for all I know that’s exactly what happened.
As for my ability to talk to the pretty girls in my class, that has much improved. I should however be aware of the dating-statute-of-limitations that is present in such scenarios, and strike while the date of accrual of causation is still within the informal limits. My mother says I’ve become more noticeably litigious-minded in these past few weeks. Personally I don’t see it.
As I write this blog, I am awaiting the departure of my flight to Cork where I will meet the heads of the research that I am doing in the hospital.
Now, as I continue this blog, I am back from Cork four days. It was like flying inside a bumble bee.
Kerry is in Dublin now, minus her baggage and now as I write this blog, I await a call from the airport to tell me that they have it, or that it was jetisoned (sp?) over the Atlantic Ocean.
Last night I had a dream that I was a horse (corporeally) riding up a river toward either a sunrise or a sunset and had some kind of female celestial being on my back speaking into my ear. This is either a sign that my soul is in pretty good shape, or that I don't have long left on the planet. Fingers crossed for the former. Yes?
Haven't seen much of the monkey lately, but I get the impression he's doing pretty ok.
Take care folks,
Buckley.